Did you know,
that despite the fact that the 22 institutions in the KozaIpek Group which have been under the management of trustees for several years now, had been investigated by all the state institutions and independent companies and found to be innocent as of 04.05.2016;
that just a month and a half later on 27.07.2016, in breach of one of the four articles of the ECHR, the principle of non-retroactivity of law which cannot be stretched even under extraordinary conditions,
the two institutions were confiscated,
and the confiscation of the two institutions was used as a justification to keep trustees in the other 20 companies in the Ipek Group,
that the assets of the Ipek family and the Ipek Group, which is a 70-year-old family company, were allocated to the trustees, politicians and their families?
Did you know,
that as part of the KozaIpek investigation,
not a single dollar was found that would constitute a justification for confiscatingits assets despite all the efforts made to find something by all the institutions of the state, MASAK, BDDK, TurkishTax Inspection Board, the SPK, the expert witnesses, MIT investigations, police investigations;
that because the prosecutor for constitutional crimes could not find a crime, he added the charge of violation of the SPK law to his ongoing investigation into a terror organisation, even though it was not his job and he was not authorised to do so;
that the prosecutor instructed the SPK to write a report, which is against the law;
that the SPK wrote reports of crime and sent them to the prosecutor;
and that there is no other case where they have confiscated all a company’s assets during the prosecution process without a trial…
ARTICLE 115 – (1) To investigate the crimes defined and referred to in this law is subject to an application in writing to the Prosecutor’s Office by the council. This application is regarded as a condition for going to trial.
ARTICLE 116 – (1) Criminal Courts of First Instance assigned by the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors are authorised to carry out jurisdiction regarding the crimes defined and referred to in this law.
DID YOU KNOW THAT WHILE A MAN OF THE LAW WITH A HEART SHOULD HAVE DROPPED THE CASE IMMEDIATELY ON 05.05.2016,
THE PROSECUTOR WAITED…
AS IF HE KNEW ABOUT THE DECREE LAW THAT WOULD BE ISSUED A MONTH AND A HALF LATER ON 27.07.2016…
AND THAT HE BASED HIS INDICTMENT ON THOSE INSTITUTIONS THAT WERE CLOSED DOWN WITH THIS DECREE LAW…
The subjects in the Ipek Group investigation that the prosecutor for constitutional crimes started on 04.08.2014:
Financial growth of the Ipek Group companies, capital structures,
the financial situation of the Ipek family including all their relatives,
assertions of the so-called expert witness, money laundering, Smurf village, keeping double-entry accounting, the computers being‘tired’, whether the Bergama gold mine was bought cheaply,
Ipek Media investments, the process for the purchase ofKanalturk,the establishment of KOZA Ltd in the UK, whether the collection of donation gold was shown as production, whether speculation was made over the number of licences, claims for financingterrorism. The slander that 7 billion, 40 million USD wassiphoned abroad, the claim offictitious gold production, transferring black money to a terrorist organisation, the claim that the Koza Foundation received a 122 million TL transfer from the Eregli Iron and Steel Works, IpekUniversity, IK Academy, the nonsense about 400 tons of gold being buried at the Angels Hotel, phone calls, contacts, even the denunciation letters of the unscrupulous people from the jail.
AS OF 04.05.2016, WHEN THE WHOLE KOZA IPEK GROUP WAS UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUSTEES,
THE PROSECUTOR WAS INFORMED BY REPORTS FROM MASAK, THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND THE COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION THAT THERE WAS NO CRIME.
DO YOU KNOW THAT IT IS NOW OFFICIALLY KNOWN BY THE PROSECUTOR THAT HE HAS JAILED INNOCENT PEOPLE, CONFISCATED THEIR ASSETS, AND DESTROYED THEIR LIVES…
Did you know that at the end of the investigation into the Koza Ipek Group and the Ipek family by the prosecutor for constitutional crimes which started on 04.08.2014, there wasn’t a single line of charge written down in his indictment which he put forward on 09.06.2017 including those sections from the start of the investigation, the raid, the confiscation, the absurd slanderby the so-called expert witness, the justification for the appointment of trustees in Masak’s preliminary report, and the denunciations which occurred during the investigation.
I’ve finally finished reading the thousands of pages of appendices of the indictment about the Ipek family, the KozaIpekGroup and the top management of the Ipek Group.
THERE ARE TWO MAIN CHARGES AS A RESULT OF THIS THREE-YEAR-LONG INVESTIGATION:
1) KozaGold, which made a profit of 3.2 billion TL, donated 178 million TL to Ipek University.
2) Ipek media has increased its capitalby 198 million TL since its foundation.
It is interesting that the Koza Ipek Group was investigated for tax crimes.
In spite of the result announced by the Ministry of Finance, the prosecutor keeps on writing to them as if there was some information he was expecting to receive. Finally, the KOZA GROUP FILE WAS TAKEN FROM THE DIRECTORATE OF LARGE TAXPAYERS AND SENT TO THE DIRECTORATE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM TAXPAYERS. On the 25th of October 2015, criminal complaints were made by Fatih Aydinli who had been newly appointed as a tax inspector to the Koza Ipek companies for which tax inspections for all the years previous to this had already been completed.
The documents concerning the seizure of the Koza Ipek Holding are in this scandalous indictment.
Erhan Başyurt 11th August 2017
News-Commentary Erhan Basyurt @Erhan_Basyurt
On the 26th of October 2015, trustees were appointed to the Koza Ipek Holding and its 22 subsidiaries based on an investigation initiated by the Ankara Public Prosecutor Musa Yucel.
This decision was followed by the bloody police raid and the trustee censorship of Ipek Media, which the public watched live on the 28th of October 2015.
The indictment against the Koza Ipek Holding was presented to the court by Prosecutor Yucel and was accepted last month, two years after the trustees had been appointed.
In the investigation that began on 04.08.2014 and in which trustees were appointed on 26.10.2015 to investigate the slanders of the so-called expert witness and that finished on 09.06.2017, all the slanders of the so-called expert witness were reviewed by MASAK.
The investigation report of MASAK dated 04.05.2016 has negated all the justifications for appointing trustees to the Koza Ipek Group. Those who fabricated the crimes concerning the family and the group who have been thoroughly investigated, and whose innocence was documented on 04.05.2016, have been proved guilty by this official document.
IT’S NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE PROSECUTOR JUST FORGOT ABOUT IT OR HIS HEART WON HIM OVER AND HE LEFT IT IN ON PURPOSE BUT,
AMONG THE APPENDICES OF THE KOZA IPEK GROUP INDICTMENT,
THE ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION AND MASAK’S CONCLUSIVE REPORT HAS COME TO LIGHT – MASAK BEING THE INSTITUTION WHO INITIALLY STARTED THE INVESTIGATION.
THE REPORT IS VERY DETAILED.
MASAK INVESTIGATED THE KOZA IPEK GROUP VERY THOROUGHLY – THE WHOLE PERIOD, STARTING FROM ITS FOUNDATION TO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE TRUSTEES AND THEY CAME TO A CONCLUSION.